A few days ago, I attended a debate featuring experts delving into the emerging threat of “Techno-Fascism” and how the manipulation of big data can sway elections and public opinion. I went in hoping to gain fresh insights into possible alternatives to this looming issue. However, about two-thirds of the event felt like preaching to the choir - lots of analysis, but not much in the way of actionable solutions.
It was assumed the audience was already familiar with current events (Quote: “I hope that I don’t have to remind you here in Berlin about the historic connections between capitalism and fascism, between technology and Nazism. I hope you know very well the connections between Henry Ford and IBM on the one hand and Nazism and Holocaust on the other hand”), and much of the discussion reiterated known analyses. In my perception, this sidestepped the hard question: “OK, what are we doing now?”